Debata poselska: Jozefaciuk:Dziambor - Revision history

ESS: /* Format */

2025-02-12T10:12:33Z

Format

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:12, 12 February 2025
Line 21:		Line 21:

	# Badania wskazują, że przymus w nauce prowadzi do utraty radości nauki, wyuczonej bezradności, oraz zwiększa ryzyko uzależnień i zaburzeń psychicznych. Czy popiera Pan zakaz stosowania przymusu w edukacji?		# Badania wskazują, że przymus w nauce prowadzi do utraty radości nauki, wyuczonej bezradności, oraz zwiększa ryzyko uzależnień i zaburzeń psychicznych. Czy popiera Pan zakaz stosowania przymusu w edukacji?
	# Ekonomiści uważają, że bony edukacyjne to najbardziej sprawiedliwy i efektywny sposób redystrybucji środków na edukację, zgodnie z potrzebami indywidualnych uczniów. Forma bonów jest stosowana w 25 z 35 krajów OECD ([https://www.~~oecd~~.org/~~en/publications~~/school-~~choice~~-~~and~~-school-~~vouchers_effdf2ea~~-~~en.html~~ źródło]). Czy popiera Pan przeniesienie kontroli nad finansowaniem edukacji z rąk rządu do rąk rodzin?		# Ekonomiści uważają, że bony edukacyjne to najbardziej sprawiedliwy i efektywny sposób redystrybucji środków na edukację, zgodnie z potrzebami indywidualnych uczniów. Forma bonów jest stosowana w 25 z 35 krajów OECD ([https://www.edchoice.org/engage/school-voucher-systems-across-globe-make-case-school-choice-u-s/ źródło]). Czy popiera Pan przeniesienie kontroli nad finansowaniem edukacji z rąk rządu do rąk rodzin?
	# Dyrektorzy szkół, nauczyciele i wizjonerzy edukacji wskazują, że jednym z największych hamulców w budowie kwitnącego systemu edukacyjnego jest zbyt mała swoboda nauczycieli i decydentów na poziomie szkół. Czy popiera Pan pełną wolność szkół w kształtowaniu oferty edukacyjnej oraz swobodę nauczycieli w kreatywnym stosowaniu metod nauczania?		# Dyrektorzy szkół, nauczyciele i wizjonerzy edukacji wskazują, że jednym z największych hamulców w budowie kwitnącego systemu edukacyjnego jest zbyt mała swoboda nauczycieli i decydentów na poziomie szkół. Czy popiera Pan pełną wolność szkół w kształtowaniu oferty edukacyjnej oraz swobodę nauczycieli w kreatywnym stosowaniu metod nauczania?

ESS: /* Rationale */

2025-02-10T13:21:19Z

Rationale

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:21, 10 February 2025
Line 29:		Line 29:
	[[Lex Libertas]] is the most precious fruit of the student strike in Poland (2022). Lex Libertas was drafted under the guidance of the Round Table of Education, which had little to do with an physical wooden table. It was all about modern tools such as Media Wiki, Discord and collective intelligence.		[[Lex Libertas]] is the most precious fruit of the student strike in Poland (2022). Lex Libertas was drafted under the guidance of the Round Table of Education, which had little to do with an physical wooden table. It was all about modern tools such as Media Wiki, Discord and collective intelligence.

	By ~~2024~~, chances of bringing Lex Libertas to Polish parliament are slim due to lack of explicit support from the members of the parliament. There were only two members of parliament who ever expressed their willingness to talk to students about their concerns. These were Artur Dziambor (2023) and Marcin Jozefaciuk (2024). What is worse, only Artur Dziambor admitted that the ideas of Lex Libertas align well with his own views on education. Both MPs have roots in education and education stands in the center of their expertise in political life. In February 2024, students proposed a debate between the MPs in hope of energizing the efforts to bring Lex Libertas to fruition. The planned coincidence of the debate with the school strike 2024 did not pan out.		By 2025, chances of bringing Lex Libertas to Polish parliament are slim due to lack of explicit support from the members of the parliament. There were only two members of parliament who ever expressed their willingness to talk to students about their concerns. These were Artur Dziambor (2023) and Marcin Jozefaciuk (2024). What is worse, only Artur Dziambor admitted that the ideas of Lex Libertas align well with his own views on education. Both MPs have roots in education and education stands in the center of their expertise in political life. In February 2024, students proposed a debate between the MPs in hope of energizing the efforts to bring Lex Libertas to fruition. The planned coincidence of the debate with the school strike 2024 did not pan out.

	A new date has been proposed: Feb 13, 2025. In the original set up, students were supposed to ask provocative questions of the MPs. Today, it makes more sense to change the formula of the debate. We should rather schedule just 3 starting point questions that would align with 3 tenets of Lex Libertas: student autonomy, school autonomy and school vouchers. These would be questions with a thesis to reflect the stand of the Round Table of Education. The MPs will be given a chance to provide their own spin on issues at hand.		A new date has been proposed: Feb 13, 2025. In the original set up, students were supposed to ask provocative questions of the MPs. Today, it makes more sense to change the formula of the debate. We should rather schedule just 3 starting point questions that would align with 3 tenets of Lex Libertas: student autonomy, school autonomy and school vouchers. These would be questions with a thesis to reflect the stand of the Round Table of Education. The MPs will be given a chance to provide their own spin on issues at hand.

ESS: /* Rationale */

2025-02-10T13:20:20Z

Rationale

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:20, 10 February 2025
Line 25:		Line 25:

	== Rationale ==		== Rationale ==
			<small>

	[[Lex Libertas]] is the most precious fruit of the student strike in Poland (2022). Lex Libertas was drafted under the guidance of the Round Table of Education, which had little to do with an physical wooden table. It was all about modern tools such as Media Wiki, Discord and collective intelligence.		[[Lex Libertas]] is the most precious fruit of the student strike in Poland (2022). Lex Libertas was drafted under the guidance of the Round Table of Education, which had little to do with an physical wooden table. It was all about modern tools such as Media Wiki, Discord and collective intelligence.
Line 35:		Line 36:

	See also: [[Why Dziambor and Jozefaciuk?]]		See also: [[Why Dziambor and Jozefaciuk?]]

			</small>

ESS: /* Format */

2025-02-10T13:19:50Z

Format

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:19, 10 February 2025
Line 18:		Line 18:
	Luzna rozmowa n.t. reformy edukacji.		Luzna rozmowa n.t. reformy edukacji.

	Trzy pytania z ~~teza zwiazane~~ z projektem [[Lex Libertas]] zada grupa ~~uczniow~~ oraz Dr Piotr Wozniak:		Trzy pytania z tezą związane z projektem [[Lex Libertas]] zada grupa uczniów oraz Dr Piotr Wozniak:

	# Badania wskazują, że przymus w nauce prowadzi do utraty radości nauki, wyuczonej bezradności, oraz zwiększa ryzyko uzależnień i zaburzeń psychicznych. Czy popiera Pan zakaz stosowania przymusu w edukacji?		# Badania wskazują, że przymus w nauce prowadzi do utraty radości nauki, wyuczonej bezradności, oraz zwiększa ryzyko uzależnień i zaburzeń psychicznych. Czy popiera Pan zakaz stosowania przymusu w edukacji?

ESS: /* Format */

2025-02-10T13:17:42Z

Format

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:17, 10 February 2025
Line 18:		Line 18:
	Luzna rozmowa n.t. reformy edukacji.		Luzna rozmowa n.t. reformy edukacji.

	~~O ile poslowie wyraza zgode, 2-3~~ pytania ~~zadadza uczniowie (patrz:~~ [[~~Pytania~~ uczniow ~~na debate Dziambor~~:~~Jozefaciuk\|propozycje pytan]])~~. ~~Alternatywnie~~, ~~mozna debate "utrudnic" zadajac pytania~~ z ~~teza~~ (~~patrz~~: ~~[[Trzy pytania edukacyjne do politykow]~~]).		Trzy pytania z teza zwiazane z projektem [[Lex Libertas]] zada grupa uczniow oraz Dr Piotr Wozniak:

			# Badania wskazują, że przymus w nauce prowadzi do utraty radości nauki, wyuczonej bezradności, oraz zwiększa ryzyko uzależnień i zaburzeń psychicznych. Czy popiera Pan zakaz stosowania przymusu w edukacji?
			# Ekonomiści uważają, że bony edukacyjne to najbardziej sprawiedliwy i efektywny sposób redystrybucji środków na edukację, zgodnie z potrzebami indywidualnych uczniów. Forma bonów jest stosowana w 25 z 35 krajów OECD ([https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/school-choice-and-school-vouchers_effdf2ea-en.html źródło]). Czy popiera Pan przeniesienie kontroli nad finansowaniem edukacji z rąk rządu do rąk rodzin?
			# Dyrektorzy szkół, nauczyciele i wizjonerzy edukacji wskazują, że jednym z największych hamulców w budowie kwitnącego systemu edukacyjnego jest zbyt mała swoboda nauczycieli i decydentów na poziomie szkół. Czy popiera Pan pełną wolność szkół w kształtowaniu oferty edukacyjnej oraz swobodę nauczycieli w kreatywnym stosowaniu metod nauczania?

	== Rationale ==		== Rationale ==

ESS: /* Technologia */

2025-02-10T13:15:05Z

Technologia

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:15, 10 February 2025
Line 12:		Line 12:

	== Technologia ==		== Technologia ==
	~~Do ustalenia. Studio (Warszawa). Google Meets?~~ Zoom~~? Discord?~~		Zoom

	== Format ==		== Format ==

ESS: /* Format */

2025-02-10T07:17:59Z

Format

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:17, 10 February 2025
Line 18:		Line 18:
	Luzna rozmowa n.t. reformy edukacji.		Luzna rozmowa n.t. reformy edukacji.

	O ile poslowie wyraza zgode, 2-3 pytania zadadza uczniowie (patrz: [[Pytania uczniow na debate Dziambor:Jozefaciuk\|propozycje pytan]]).		O ile poslowie wyraza zgode, 2-3 pytania zadadza uczniowie (patrz: [[Pytania uczniow na debate Dziambor:Jozefaciuk\|propozycje pytan]]). Alternatywnie, mozna debate "utrudnic" zadajac pytania z teza (patrz: [[Trzy pytania edukacyjne do politykow]]).

	== Rationale ==		== Rationale ==

ESS: /* Data */

2025-02-10T07:00:07Z

Data

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:00, 10 February 2025
Line 7:		Line 7:

	== Data ==		== Data ==
	13 lutego 2025 (czwartek).		13 lutego 2025 (czwartek). Godzina 20:00.

	Prowadzacy Jan Kuban ~~proponuje godzine 20:00~~.		Prowadzacy Jan Kuban (PAFERE).

	== Technologia ==		== Technologia ==

ESS: /* Rationale */

2025-01-13T11:01:02Z

Rationale

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:01, 13 January 2025
Line 26:		Line 26:
	By 2024, chances of bringing Lex Libertas to Polish parliament are slim due to lack of explicit support from the members of the parliament. There were only two members of parliament who ever expressed their willingness to talk to students about their concerns. These were Artur Dziambor (2023) and Marcin Jozefaciuk (2024). What is worse, only Artur Dziambor admitted that the ideas of Lex Libertas align well with his own views on education. Both MPs have roots in education and education stands in the center of their expertise in political life. In February 2024, students proposed a debate between the MPs in hope of energizing the efforts to bring Lex Libertas to fruition. The planned coincidence of the debate with the school strike 2024 did not pan out.		By 2024, chances of bringing Lex Libertas to Polish parliament are slim due to lack of explicit support from the members of the parliament. There were only two members of parliament who ever expressed their willingness to talk to students about their concerns. These were Artur Dziambor (2023) and Marcin Jozefaciuk (2024). What is worse, only Artur Dziambor admitted that the ideas of Lex Libertas align well with his own views on education. Both MPs have roots in education and education stands in the center of their expertise in political life. In February 2024, students proposed a debate between the MPs in hope of energizing the efforts to bring Lex Libertas to fruition. The planned coincidence of the debate with the school strike 2024 did not pan out.

	A new date has been proposed: ~~Sep 2024~~. In the original set up, students were supposed to ask provocative questions of the MPs. Today, it makes more sense to change the formula of the debate. We should rather schedule just 3 starting point questions that would align with 3 tenets of Lex Libertas: student autonomy, school autonomy and school vouchers. These would be questions with a thesis to reflect the stand of the Round Table of Education. The MPs will be given a chance to provide their own spin on issues at hand.		A new date has been proposed: Feb 13, 2025. In the original set up, students were supposed to ask provocative questions of the MPs. Today, it makes more sense to change the formula of the debate. We should rather schedule just 3 starting point questions that would align with 3 tenets of Lex Libertas: student autonomy, school autonomy and school vouchers. These would be questions with a thesis to reflect the stand of the Round Table of Education. The MPs will be given a chance to provide their own spin on issues at hand.

	The debate will crown the achievements of 3 years of student attempts to organize a protest against coercive schooling. 3 years of fight for human rights in Polish schools.		The debate will crown the achievements of 3 years of student attempts to organize a protest against coercive schooling. 3 years of fight for human rights in Polish schools.

	See also: [[Why Dziambor and Jozefaciuk?]]		See also: [[Why Dziambor and Jozefaciuk?]]

ESS: /* Data */

2025-01-13T10:59:41Z

Data

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:59, 13 January 2025
Line 7:		Line 7:

	== Data ==		== Data ==
	~~Do ustalenia miedzy poslami. Listopad 2024~~.		13 lutego 2025 (czwartek).

	Prowadzacy Jan Kuban proponuje godzine 20:00.		Prowadzacy Jan Kuban proponuje godzine 20:00.